The Ethical Implications of Pet Cloning: Are ,000 Clones Human Too?

In recent years, the scientific community has made significant strides in the field of cloning, with pet cloning becoming a reality for those who can afford it. For a hefty price tag of ,000, you can have your beloved pet cloned, raising a myriad of ethical questions. One such question that has sparked considerable debate is whether these expensive clones can be considered human too. This article aims to delve into the ethical implications of pet cloning and explore the question of their humanity.

Understanding Pet Cloning

Pet cloning is a scientific process that involves creating a genetically identical copy of a pet. This is achieved through a process known as somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), where the nucleus of a somatic cell from a donor animal is transferred into an egg cell that has had its nucleus removed. The resulting embryo is then implanted into a surrogate animal, which gives birth to the clone.

Are Pet Clones Human?

While pet clones share the same genetic material as their donor animals, they are not human. They are simply identical copies of the original pet. The question of their humanity arises from a misunderstanding of what cloning is. Cloning does not create a new species; it merely replicates an existing one. Therefore, a cloned pet is still a pet, not a human.

Ethical Implications of Pet Cloning

Despite the clear distinction between pet clones and humans, the practice of pet cloning raises several ethical concerns. These include:

  • Animal Welfare: The process of cloning often involves multiple attempts, leading to a high number of miscarriages and deformities. This raises serious concerns about the welfare of the surrogate animals and the cloned pets.
  • Genetic Diversity: Cloning reduces genetic diversity, which is crucial for the health and survival of a species. A population of clones is more susceptible to diseases and environmental changes.
  • Commodification of Life: The high cost of pet cloning commodifies life, turning pets into luxury items that only the wealthy can afford. This could lead to increased inequality and exploitation of animals.


While pet cloning offers the enticing prospect of immortalizing our beloved pets, it is fraught with ethical dilemmas. It is crucial to understand that pet clones are not human, and their creation should not be taken lightly. As we continue to push the boundaries of science, it is our responsibility to ensure that we do so ethically, considering the welfare of all living beings involved.